Asylum Seekers giving Refugees a bad name

Image

NOTE: I originally wrote this for the Daily Telegraph, but understandably, Bush Fire reporting took priority and it didn’t go to print.

Asylum Seekers giving Refugees a bad name.

Thinking back to WWII, there’s plenty for much of the world to be ashamed of in the way non-combatants were treated, especially Jewish people subject to confinement, torture and death, merely for being Jewish.

Since then, the treatment of people running for their lives has developed substantially. The intention being to make sure innocent defenceless people are not left to be killed, or denied movement across borders in search of safety.

These days, one seeks Asylum, but like most well meaning plans, the system has become so broad, some people are just picking a country that looks good and heading there with the intention of being assessed as a refugee.

Abuse of good intentions has become so rampant that, ‘Asylum Seekers’, are giving Refugees, a bad name. The abuse is assisted to a great degree by a high level of misinformation and with that, misplaced sympathy and guilt.

One issue is the mistaken belief asylum seeker and refugee means the same thing, so questioning of asylum seekers is taken as a, ‘dirty assault on people who’ve faced dreadful hardship in the course of fleeing for their lives’.

Asylum seekers aren’t refugees. They may ultimately be assessed and given refugee status, but in the first instance, they are merely seeking protection. The question is, protection from what?

Increasingly we’re seeing more and more who by all appearances are seeking protection from having to live in the third world, or any place not as good as Australia.

The vast majority of those arriving by boat start their journey on international flights that land in Indonesia. When they touchdown in Indonesia, they have various documents including passports, but these are disposed of prior to the boat ride to Australia.

For those of you familiar with, ‘The Sound of Music’, these international jetsetters bear no resemblance to the Family Von Trapp climbing the Swiss Alps to escape the Nazis.

No one is chasing them and if they were ever under any threat, they left the danger thousands of kilometres behind as they skipped over many countries were they would’ve been safe – such is not the pursuit of safety, but lifestyle.

A system intended to never allow again the suffering of the WWII era, is being completely abused by opportunistic country shoppers facilitated by the equivalent of black market travel agencies.

Where once there were people fleeing for their lives aided by an underground of volunteers who risked execution, we now have lifestyle seekers starting their journey on international flights with trips organized by professional highly paid people smugglers.

Most outstanding though is a lot of Australians don’t seem to relate to the honey pot that is our own nation. Its capacity to draw opportunists even if they’re aware there may be some problems getting here.

These people come from places where their lives are certainly difficult compared to ours. It’s generally not life-threatening as they pretend, but the life-style advantages in Australia draw them.

When used to a very basic standard of living in a third world country or similar, even what Australians consider poverty, is by comparison, luxurious.

When one’s lifestyle is subsistence with poor housing, minimal sanitation, little or no healthcare, or electricity and little to no government assistance, ie various forms of welfare, Australia is Paradise. Work out how to play the system and one may enjoy this forever.

Many Aussies don’t see this – perhaps they judge matters from their own circumstances. Most Australians don’t aspire to be members of a low socio-economic group funded by welfare for life, so they don’t relate to its worth.

In the last few weeks there have been two stand-out events in terms of the propaganda attached to so called ‘asylum seekers’. The first is the recent tragic drownings from a boat where the passengers were reported to be predominately Lebanese.

Lebanese people claiming refugee status? Aussies go to Lebanon on holidays – I’ve been there myself – I’ve got Friends with businesses there. These were arguably illegals looking for a lifestyle improvement for which you and I would pay.

A couple of weeks ago hundreds of Africans drowned when their boat went down while headed for Europe. No mention of Refugees, or even asylum seekers. The report told it how it was – describing the boat’s occupants as “hoped for a better life” migrants. They were further described as people escaping poverty for what they believed would be a better life in Europe.

No country blamed for their deaths and no attempt to make this unfortunate group out to be anything other than what they were – illegal immigrants taking a chance for a better life.

If there was a difference between the Africans and the recent boat tragedy en-route to Australia, it’s that those on the boat to Australia had thousands of dollars for international airfares and came from a safer, more advanced place.

Everyday we’re taken for a ride by country shoppers, so called, ’refugee advocates’, and a plethora of fellow travellers intent on open borders and access to our services and taxes for whoever can get here.

It’s time to re-evaluate the true circumstances of those who skip over many countries to get specifically to Australia. They’ve gone past safety many times on the way, so clearly it’s not safety they’re seeking.

8 comments

  1. queenbeestings1@gmail.com · · Reply

    SPOT ON DAVID !!!!!

    1. Thank you Queenbee. I’m sorry this one missed being printed by the Daily Telegraph. Very few Aussies seem to properly understand the fraud being committed against us, in part, thanks to the united nations and ridiculous assessments and certainly aided by misinformation through media which creates sympathy well beyond what is warranted.

  2. Lena Hammond · · Reply

    A very interesting article David and I haven’t really much to add, except to say that this country has always thrived on the arrivals of immigrant – legal immigrants,who have come here with the intention of not just making it better for themselves but also for they country they chose to come to and I think that is what most Australians would want.
    Kind regards
    Lena

    1. Indeed Lena, Australia has been enriched by quality immigrants from all over the world and is now being made poor culturally as well as financially by country shoppers who see us for the easy touch our governments have allowed us to become.

  3. This week Rupert Murdoch presented the 2013 Lowy Lecture.

    I have a lot of time for our successful Australian businessmen & women, but I wish Rupert would be as direct as Oldfield and, like Oldfield, call an ace an ace.

    Through the lens of his parent’s escape from Nazi oppression, Rupert says: “immigration adds its own dynamism to any economy – but having a diverse immigrant population is also a precious resource as we engage the world.”

    Rupert missed an ideal opportunity to explain the difference between great immigrants, such as his and Frank Lowy’s Dad & Mum, and the queue jumpers who currently arrive with no intention of embracing anything of our culture except our welfare system and liberty.

    Mr Lowy, for the sake of our Country, please consider David Oldfield as presenter of the 2014 Lowy Lecture.

    1. Kind beyond words Stuart, Thank you.

  4. […] the issue of processing asylum seekers. The Liberal Party, with the help of the mainstream media, have successfully frightened Australians out of treating asylum seekers with decency since the […]

    1. I have approved the above comment only because of my support for freedom of speech.

      The material is typical of asylum seeker supporter propaganda. It seeks to create sympathy and of course it is difficult not to feel sorry for those worse off than oneself, but such feelings must be tempered with rational considerations. These include the responsibility of people for their own circumstances and judgement as to whether those worse off are so because they are genuine refugees or because they simply come from a primitive place. Did fleeing to Australia and passing many safe havens along the way occur because they were in life threatening danger or because Australia is a soft welfare touch that will support their every need for the rest of their lives.

      Those coming to Australia by boat are country shoppers. Even if they had a reason to leave their country, they passed many places where they could stop in safety including indonesia, but from the outset, they have chosen Australia as a destination like a tourist selects a holiday, because of what’s on offer.

      These are arguably illegal immigrants dressed up as refugees and too many have already played the system to stay in Australia. There are two types of Australians who are party to this. First are those who have been taken in and are largely ignorant of the facts.

      Such people likely believe Australia is actually saving the lives of desperate hunted people with nowhere else to run – delusional of course, but it’s natural for sympathy to get in the way of good sense. Quite often, they just don’t understand the ramifications of their misplaced desire to do what they think is, ‘the right thing’.

      The second group are far more dangerous and sinister. This lot are international socialists who do not believe in borders or sovereignty as such. They are more than happy for any number of these so called, ‘asylum seekers’, to come to Australia. For them this is just another way of breaking down our way of life and redistributing wealth. Such people can be found in all political parties and in all walks of life – there are quite a few who fit this category to a greater or lesser degree. You’ll often find them in the media. Beware of those using the term, ‘Social Justice’.

      This second group even see our pensioners as well off because to them it is all a matter of international comparison. Ironically, they tend not to wish to divide what they have as individuals and see the state as responsible for their policies of wealth redistribution. This simply means more mouths to feed from the same pot, but that’s ok for the international socialists among us, for they see Australians as having way too much.

      Many within both of these groups would consider their actions as an enlightened approach. They think they’re ensuring justice and equality for fellow humans – they are at best, naive.

      Anyway, if you wish you may follow the above post and decide for yourself – that’s what freedom of speech is all about – being willing to have expressed that with which you totally disagree.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: